Gibson Dunn is pushing again after an unsealed sanctions movement and a few very skeptical decide feedback earned the agency some unlucky notoriety. Plaintiffs accused the agency of holding up discovery with one hand, whereas arguing that additional discovery was “too late” with the opposite.
The Biglaw agency representing “the artist previously referred to as Fb” within the Cambridge Analytica case says the movement presents a false account and that the staff is “mortified” by the decide’s feedback, suggesting at hearings that the plaintiffs might have a degree in the case of their discovery complaints.
From the agency’s perspective, “Discovery on this case has not been simple, and has concerned quite a few disputes between the events on vital and infrequently technically advanced points which have taken time to work via.”
The decide mentioned that Gibson Dunn’s opposition faces a “little little bit of an uphill battle” primarily based on what he’s seen thus far, so this opposition submitting higher be epic.
In our unique publish, we famous that there are completely affordable explanations for a number of the alleged missteps. However Decide Chhabria appears inclined to take a dim view of so many points compounding upon themselves.
We’re trying ahead to the upcoming Could 19 listening to!
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Regulation and co-host of Considering Like A Lawyer. Be happy to e mail any suggestions, questions, or feedback. Comply with him on Twitter in the event you’re concerned about regulation, politics, and a wholesome dose of school sports activities information. Joe additionally serves as a Managing Director at RPN Government Search.